emotions do get the better of us (all of us) sometimes, men included....we too have hormones, although there are some that want to outlaw the male version of em.......
there are so many issues and not enought time to get to all of them......my own impatience has shown through.......thanks to those of you who did take not this personally (not that I could at this point)......these are important issues......
I have always strongly supported women and women's issues and for some naive reason thoguht they would do the same with men's issues......now that I know that that is not true, I have woken up........
there is not one thing that has put me in a tizzy, folks, it is many many things, decades plus........and finally waking up.........
I have many many more articles and they arent all about the same subject.....they are each about a different part of a very important subject........gender issues.......demostic violence, and so much more
www.backlash.com/book/domv.html
One of the most interesting things about science and social science research is that what you expect to find is often what you find (if you keep a closed mind). If you dare to open your mind, sometimes you find that reality isnt how you percieved it........In another article titled "Unsafe at Home," Seattle Post-Intelligencer reporter Tina Kelley quoted Carolyne Ford, program director at a Seattle shelter for abused women and their children, as saying "People think batterers are out of control, but that's not true. Generally, all they beat are their spouses, girlfriends or partners." Kelley's article made no mention of abusive women, and the accompanying chart indicated all batterers are male. Where did this come from? It was "just something I had a feel for," Kelley said. The problem is "90 percent male, 10 percent female."
How could a major metropolitan newspaper report a statistical distribution based on a reporter's feelings?
ATH