Yet another reason to despise the ambulance chaser
Moderator: Available
Sorry Bill, just going by the limited info you included, otherwise I would have to assume that there were other positive categories besides "very" and "completely", which may or may not have been the case. I've taken a survey methodology course, and participated in enough corporate surveys to know about corporations preference for skewing surveys in favor of positive responsesBill Glasheen wrote: Please don't misquote me. I said what I meant and I meant what I said. A little survey methodology research on your part might be in order.
People have a tendency to select categories toward the middle, so getting the response you want is all in how the questions are asked.Please rate your satisfaction with (our product, your job...)
- Completely satisfied
- Very satisfied
- Somewhat satisfied
- Unsatisfied

Glenn
- Bill Glasheen
- Posts: 17299
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
- Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY
- Bill Glasheen
- Posts: 17299
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
- Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY
Re: one 'unsatisfied' customer
Definitely a British commercial - for many reasons.Van Canna wrote:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... =101446820

- Bill
- Bill Glasheen
- Posts: 17299
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
- Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY
Which is why standardized instruments used in the health care industry have a central tendency score as neutral.Glenn wrote:
People have a tendency to select categories toward the middle, so getting the response you want is all in how the questions are asked.
The health care industry has been doing surveys for a generation. They use survey instruments that are validated, and often offered by a neutral source (e.g. National Committee for Quality Assurance).
- Bill
I'll try to make it clear: you think that the companies who go looking for an unreported history of acne when they find out a beneficiary has acute leukemia so they can deny care don't have a top-down mentality of cost saving?
How about those f'ing morons I talked to about epo for an hour who just wanted a non-excuse to deny coverage for a few weeks while he filed complaints, even though that would cost them more in hospitalizations?
The CEO knew. Or should have known.
How about those f'ing morons I talked to about epo for an hour who just wanted a non-excuse to deny coverage for a few weeks while he filed complaints, even though that would cost them more in hospitalizations?
The CEO knew. Or should have known.
--Ian
- Bill Glasheen
- Posts: 17299
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
- Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY
B1tch away. The stage is yours.IJ wrote:
I'll try to make it clear: you think that the companies who go looking for an unreported history of acne when they find out a beneficiary has acute leukemia so they can deny care don't have a top-down mentality of cost saving?
How about those f'ing morons I talked to about epo for an hour who just wanted a non-excuse to deny coverage for a few weeks while he filed complaints, even though that would cost them more in hospitalizations?
The CEO knew. Or should have known.
- Bill